Begin of page section:
Page sections:

  • Go to contents (Accesskey 1)
  • Go to position marker (Accesskey 2)
  • Go to main navigation (Accesskey 3)
  • Go to sub navigation (Accesskey 4)
  • Go to additional information (Accesskey 5)
  • Go to page settings (user/language) (Accesskey 8)
  • Go to search (Accesskey 9)

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections

Begin of page section:
Page settings:

English en
Deutsch de
Search
Login

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections

Begin of page section:
Search:

Search for details about Uni Graz
Close

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections


Search

Begin of page section:
Main navigation:

Page navigation:

  • University

    University
    • About the University
    • Organisation
    • Faculties
    • Library
    • Working at University of Graz
    • Campus
    Developing solutions for the world of tomorrow - that is our mission. Our students and our researchers take on the great challenges of society and carry the knowledge out.
  • Research Profile

    Research Profile
    • Our Expertise
    • Research Questions
    • Research Portal
    • Promoting Research
    • Research Transfer
    • Ethics in Research
    Scientific excellence and the courage to break new ground. Research at the University of Graz creates the foundations for making the future worth living.
  • Studies

    Studies
    • Prospective Students
    • Students
    • Welcome Weeks for First Year Students
  • Community

    Community
    • International
    • Location
    • Research and Business
    • Alumni
    The University of Graz is a hub for international research and brings together scientists and business experts. Moreover, it fosters the exchange and cooperation in study and teaching.
  • Spotlight
Topics
  • StudiGPT is here! Try it out!
  • Sustainable University
  • Researchers answer
  • Work for us
Close menu

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections

Begin of page section:
You are here:

University of Graz Faculty of Humanities Department of American Studies Research Culture and Representation
  • Our Department
  • People
  • Research
  • Studying
  • News

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections

Begin of page section:
Sub navigation:

  • Our Department
  • People
  • Research
  • Studying
  • News

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections

Culture and Representation

In the last decades, both cultural studies and questions of representation have gained in prominence and have received ample theoretical discussion within and beyond American Studies. Our research in this area focuses on American Cultural Studies both theoretically and by analyzing specific forms of representation (films, comics, graphic novels, photographs, dance, etc.). Thus “textual” analysis is here extended to the study of other forms of cultural expression, resulting also in the need to question theoretical and methodological approaches (semiotics, image-analysis, discourse analysis, etc.). Thematically, the area comprises inquiries as diverse as families, heroes, daughters, iconicity, space and animals. Needless to say, this research area has overlaps with many of the other research endeavors conducted at the Department of American Studies in Graz.

Klaus Rieser

Klaus Rieser is Ao.Univ.-Prof. for American Studies at the University of Graz, where he researches and teaches in the field of cultural studies and visual cultures. He chaired the Department of American Studies from 2007 to 2013 and from 2016 to 2017. His research areas include U.S. film, representations of family, social gender (masculinity) and ethnicity, and visual cultural studies. His books have focused on migration in film, experimental films, and masculinity in film. Several articles and co-edited books address iconic figures and cultural contact spaces, among other topics. He is co-editor of the book series “American Studies in Austria” and is a member of the editorial team for the open access journal JAAAS: Journal of the Austrian Association for American Studies, which began publication in 2019.

Klaus Rieser, Portrait ©Klaus Rieser
©Klaus Rieser

Culture and Representation Projects

Families and kinship, father-daughter relations, in film, graphic novels, etc.

Research in this area focuses on the cultural representation of families and kinship. Klaus Rieser is particularly interested in the visual representation of father-daughter relationships. As Stella Bruzzi has pointed out (Bruzzi, xv), historically, father-son movies have greatly outnumbered father-daughter movies. Recent years, however, have brought a greater number and more diverse representations of fatherhood. Some of these also establish new modes of daughter-father relations, while others continue the tradition of silencing the mother or exculpate incestuous-abusive relationships. Graphic Novels, in contrast to films, portray a wider variety and often allow for a more active part on the part of daughters.

Liminal masculinity, heroic masculinity, in visual culture

Gender relations and gender hierarchies continue to play an essential role both in western cultures and their forms of representations. Starting from the 1990s, masculinity studies are a twin area to feminist research that analyzes and critiques patriarchal practices. Such research is always both focused on questions of power but also of representation because (gendered) identity is itself created in social performativity (Butler). In this process, media not only distribute but also norm the representations of these individual-social subjectivities. However, the normative (re)production of masculine and feminine identity in films is always in response to their inherent fluidity and heterogeneity (in terms of race, age, economies of desire, etc.). Klaus Rieser has analyzed liminal masculinities, heroic figures and is now particularly interested in representations of fatherhood.

Iconicity, images, visual culture

Images are overwhelmingly present in American life, a fact that has prompted Frederic Jameson in 1988 to diagnose a "transformation of reality into images" (14) and W.J.T. Mitchell in 1994 to pronounce a "pictorial turn" (11). Amongst this flood, a limited number of images gain wider prominence and remain in the public consciousness for some time, thereby becoming icons. In contrast to common images, thus, icons are special markers within the cultural matrix of meaning, highly relevant for the day-to-day integration of the American social landscape which, due to population size and heterogeneity has always been in particular need of nationally integrative symbols.

Obviously, icons are embedded in national (and global) discourses and power relations (cf. Lauren Berlant's "National Symbolic"). However, in their appeal to a broad and heterogeneous audience they also serve democratic functions. They achieve this because they tend to have multiple and constantly shifting meanings and epitomize social realities, including conflicts and contradictions. The research into iconic images reveals a surprising ambivalence and openness. Despite their hegemonic base and distribution, they often depend on grass-roots or individual proliferation and reproduction and are often legible in diverse, even contradictory ways.

Narrative fiction film, comparison of film and literature, film genres

Research in the area of culture and representation is not necessarily based on constructionist approaches to the social - nor necessarily directed at ideological critique. It is also engaged in an analysis of the functioning of media texts, in a formal analysis of the narrative and audio-visual properties of visual artifacts. Research in this vein, loosely to be defined as film narratology, looks at how description/depiction work in film in comparison to literature, on the uses of absence in narrative fiction film, or at the textual functioning and functions of amateur film. For example, research filmic absences reveals that film differs essentially from literature in that, due to its multi-modal and pluri-codal character, it depends essentially on a play with presence and absence. Specifically, the border-zone of significant absences to mere non-presences and to the level of the signified is more porous than in literature, depending particularly on filmic codes or traditions and their variation in individual films.

Another project, an ethnographic/textual analysis of "ephemeral film", shows that amateur film practitioners mix and combine the languages of mainstream film and "home movies," to ultimately establish a unique discourse. Film club meetings and competitions on a local, regional, national, and international level result in a formal and social codification of this discourse. Thus, a reading of the filmic text has to be extended to its social production and presentation settings.

The global and the local, representations of cultural interaction, questions of space, place, and time

Contemporary theories regard space/place as both enabling and themselves the result of social practices. "Space is permeated with social relations," wrote Lefebvre in The Production of Space, quite some time before the announcement of a "spatial turn." Often, the analysis rests on a distinction between an abstract, Cartesian, "map" space and embodied, lived-in space, the latter of which is more likely to be represented in narrative. These space/place theories (by David Harvey, Edward Soja, and others) are particularly useful for analyzing the representation of social phenomena such as cultural contact, migration or of utopian reimaginations thereof.

The social functioning of artistic practices is at the center of a project on two social dance forms - Contact Improvisation and Five Rhythms. Here, the analysis encompasses both phenomenological aspects such as the affective effects of shared feelings of gravity as well as the interrelation between the actual dance its organizational forms. Contact Improvisation, which combines intense contact with unscored improvisation, is an extremely open and flexible but highly interpersonal form of social dance. This improvisational, anarchic aspect of the dance itself is matched by a non-codified, almost non-existent organizational structure: There is no "school of contact improvisation" or an official teacher training and it is practiced in workshops, festivals, and, predominantly, open jams. In contrast, Five Rhythms is at the same time more individualistic and organized. The dance is most often guided through the interventions of a certified teacher/MC, its predominant form is that of a workshop, and it is a registered trademark with a centralized organizational structure. Interestingly, despite these differences, the two dance forms in part draw on the same type of practitioners and aim for similar effects.

More Information:

Research Portal: Klaus Rieser

Begin of page section:
Additional information:

University of Graz
Universitaetsplatz 3
8010 Graz
Austria
  • Contact
  • Web Editors
  • Moodle
  • UNIGRAZonline
  • Imprint
  • Data Protection Declaration
  • Accessibility Declaration
Weatherstation
Uni Graz

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections

Begin of page section:

End of this page section. Go to overview of page sections